Legal Opinion

Jackson Skirt & Novelty Co. v. Rosenbaum

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 30, 1915No. 2626PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western Disirict of Michigan; Arthur C. Denison and Clarence W. Sessions, Judges. 'Suit iti equity by the Js.ckson Skirt & Novelty Company against Uottis 'Rosenbaum, Goddie Rosenbaum, and Edwin E. Rosenbaum, jointly and severally and as copartners under the name of the Henrietta Skirt Company, and the Samuel Rosenbaum & Sons Company. Decree for defendants, and complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

SANEORD, District Judge.

This is a bill in equity brought by the appellant, The Jackson Skirt and Novelty Company, against the appellees, Douis Rosenbaum and others, for the alleged infringement of letters patent No. 750,234, on skirts, issued to the appellant, on January 19, 1904, as the assignee of the alleged inventors, W. T. Smith and J. V. Malnight. Among the defenses relied on were the invalidity of the patent for want of invention, and non-infringement. After final hearing on the pleadings and proof, the court below entered a decree dismissing the bill o f complaint, with costs; from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Richards v. Chase Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Standard Caster & Wheel Co. v. Caster Socket Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
  4. Cincinnati Traction Co. v. PopeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
  5. National Tube Co. v. AikenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Willow River Water Users Ass'n v. Orchards Water Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Hann v. Venetian Blind Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1936
  3. Gilchrist v. F. B. Mallory Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API