Ward v. Sturdivant
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Howard Circuit Court; W. S. Bakin, Special Judge; Appellant’s objection to the court’s refusal to give instructions is too general. Likewise as to the instructions given by the court, the statement that “plaintiff excepted to all of said instructions” is too general, and can not avail here. 38 Ark. 528; 39 Ark. 337; 54 Ark. 16; 59 Ark. 312; Id. 370; 60 Ark. 250; 75 Ark. 181; 76 Ark. 41; 78 Ark. 7; 79 Ark. 338;' 80 Ark. 528; 84 Ark. 73; 84 Ark. 95.
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
This suit was brought by the appellant against the appellee for the possession of a certain tract of land in Howard County. Appellant claimed under a sheriff’s deed issued by virtue of a sale of the land under execution to satisfy a judgment in favor of appellant against one J. B. Sturdivant.
Appellant alleged that J. B. Sturdivant sold the land in controversy to W. A. J. Sturdivant for the fraudulent purpose of cheating, hindering and delaying, his creditors, of whom appellant was one. The appellee, W. A. Sturdivant, denied that the land in controversy was sold for the fraudulent purpose of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Quertermous v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Dunnington v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
- Young v. StevensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Walnut Ridge Mercantile Co. v. CohnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Graham and Seaman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Pendleton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Long v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919