Legal Opinion

In re Maloney

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 2002No. 2001-1726PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} Oral argument is cancelled.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of In re Bicknell, 96 Ohio St.3d 76, 2002-0hio-3615, 771 N.E.2d 846.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., would order the parties to show cause why this cause should not be decided on the authority of In re Bicknell. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re BicknellOhio Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re MaloneyOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In re WurglerMedina County Court of Common Pleas · 2005