Legal Opinion

O'Kane v. Zoning Hear. Bd. of Haverford

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1990No. 110 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARBIERI, Senior Judge.

Michael and Elizabeth O’Kane (Appellants) appeal the order of the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas (trial court) affirming the decision of the Zoning Hearing Board of Haverford Township (Board) which denied Appellants a variance. We will affirm the trial court’s order.

Appellants’ property contains both a residence, which has been converted into two one-bedroom apartments, as well as a detached garage, which is used as an office and storage area for supplies in connection with the plumbing business operated by Appellants. This property is located in an 0-2…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Philadelphia v. AngeloneCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Kollock v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Merion Park Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Sweeney v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Piecknick v. South Strabane Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Patullo v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. J.A. Omatick v. Cecil Twp. ZHB v. Cecil Twp. Bd. of Supers.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. Northeastern Gas Co. v. Foster Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API