Barron v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS’ JURY DEMAND
DIANE K. VESCOVO, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the court is the November 7, 2012 motion of the defendant, Bankers Life and Casualty Company (“Bankers Life”), to strike as untimely under Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the jury demand that the plaintiffs, Royee Barron and Deborah Barron (“the plaintiffs”), filed on October 24, 2012. (Def.’s Mot. Strike Pis.’ Jury Demand, D.E. 15.) The plaintiffs oppose the motion, arguing that the demand was timely under Rule 38, or, in the alternative, that the court…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Thornburgh v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Guadalupe Guajardo, Jr., Cross-Appellants v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Ruth Kitchen v. Chippewa Valley Schools Chippewa Valley School Board of Education George Depillo Thomas Scullen and Edward SkowneskiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Duane Moody v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Trixler Brokerage Company, a California Corporation v. Ralston Purina Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hill v. Accordia Life and Annuity CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2021
- West Bend Mutual Insurance Company v. Osmic, IncDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
- West Bend Mutual Insurance Company v. Osmic, IncDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024