Legal Opinion

Hays v. McGuirt

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 19, 1932No. 4-2754PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). It is insisted that the court erred in instructing the jury that if they found “that there was no valuable consideration moving to the plaintiff from the defendant for the execution of the release,” it should be disregarded. This instruction was erroneous, misleading and prejudicial. It cannot be said there was no valuable consideration for the execution of the release, whether it was moving to the plaintiff from the defendant or not. The testimony on appellant’s part conduced to show that the plaintiff herself received no consideration for the execution…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rockafellow v. PeaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
  2. Jonesboro Hardware Co. v. Western Tie & Timber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Gardner v. WardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  4. Texas Company v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  5. Phoenix Cement Sidewalk Co. v. Russellville Water & Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arkansas Iron & Metal Co. v. First National Bank of RogersCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Quattlebaum v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Guinn v. HolcombeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Cates v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  5. McMorella v. Buckner State BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API