Legal Opinion

People v. Montes

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jones, J.

We are called upon to determine whether the inability to recall an unavailable witness violated defendant’s rights under the Confrontation Clause. We find it did not.

*252In June 2004, defendant and his friend, Carlos Gonzalez, were implicated in the shooting of Robinson Lopez. The victim died from multiple gunshot wounds. Defendant was charged with murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees.

At trial the prosecution had relied upon the testimonies of Loraine Ceballo and Tamika Taylor, two witnesses to the shooting.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. People v. MontesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  2. People v. HicksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. HICKS, RAYLAND L., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. People v. FieldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  5. People v. HicksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API