Nichols & Co. v. Burton
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 1 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL EROM SCOTT CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— 3 .Duct. N. Y. Rep., 249. 2 Hilton's N. Y. C. P. R.; Benson vs. Paine. Sill 4' Denio's N. Y., 392; Moran vs. Vrcdenburgh. 7 Miss., 604; Little vs. Davidson. 1Walls Sf Scrg., 334. 9 Port., 98 ; Lumpkin vs. Phillips. 1 Mil., 492; Davidson vs. Kelly. 1 B. Mon., 200; Doniphan vs. Gill. 2 Rich., 601; Gardner vs. Ilurst. CITED— 1 B. Mon., 200; Doniphan vs. Gill. 1 Bibb, 41; Finnell vs. Martin.
Read the full summary
CASE 1 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL EROM SCOTT CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— 3 .Duct. N. Y. Rep., 249. 2 Hilton's N. Y. C. P. R.; Benson vs. Paine. Sill 4' Denio's N. Y., 392; Moran vs. Vrcdenburgh. 7 Miss., 604; Little vs. Davidson. 1Walls Sf Scrg., 334. 9 Port., 98 ; Lumpkin vs. Phillips. 1 Mil., 492; Davidson vs. Kelly. 1 B. Mon., 200; Doniphan vs. Gill. 2 Rich., 601; Gardner vs. Ilurst. CITED— 1 B. Mon., 200; Doniphan vs. Gill. 1 Bibb, 41; Finnell vs. Martin. Monroe Harlan's Digest, p. 17, and cases there referred to. 5 John., 68 ; Toby vs. Baker. 3 J. J. Mar., 195; Bank of Commonwealth vs.…
1Opinion of the Court
CHEEP JUSTICE WILLIAMS
delivered tiie opinion op the court:
The firm of Nichols & Co. being indebted to appellees by open account in the sum of one hundred and eleven dollars and sixteen cents, April 25, 1867, Nichols, one of the firm, gave his individual acceptance therefor, which not being paid, the appellees sued and obtained judgment thereon, and had a return of no property on execution. Subsequently, they brought this suit against Nichols & Lightburn, the original partners, who separately plead the said acceptance, suit, judgment, and execution, in bar thereof. There was but one witness in…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Hunt v. SemoninCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1881