Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Secretary of State

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1923No. Calendar No. 30,686PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case plaintiff asks for a writ of mandamus, directing the secretary of State to submit to the legal voters of the State, at the coming April *543election, an amendment to article 11 of the Constitution, by adding thereto two new sections to be known as sections 16 and 17, to read as fellows:

“Section 16. From and after August 1st, 1924, all children residing in the State of Michigan, between the ages of seven years and sixteen years, shall attend a public school until they have graduated from the eighth grade.
“Sec. 17. The legislature shall enact all necessary legislation, to render said…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Browne v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  3. Bingo Coalition for Charity—Not Politics v. Board of State CanvassersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Consumers Power Co. v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Hamilton v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API