Legal Opinion

Smith v. Frost

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 18, 1915PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Equitable petition. Before Judge Walker. Washington superior court. March 6, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. In 1859 a grantor conveyed by deed certain described land to a named trustee. So far as necessary to'be stated, the substance of the deed was,as follows: The grantor “hath given, granted, released, aliened, and conveyed unto” a named trustee “and his assigns, in trust for his aforementioned children” (naming them), among them being a daughter, Priscilla, “for and during their natural lives, with remainder over to their children; and in case any of the above-mentioned children should die, leaving no child or children or representative of children, then the said remainder to which said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. East Rome Town Co. v. CothranSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  2. Vernoy v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Smith v. HawksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  2. West v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Munford v. PeeplesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  4. Newton v. BullardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  5. Frost v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API