Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdory
Supreme Court of Alabama
1DissentThomas, Justice
I have only to say that in my opinion the Bradford Act, Acts of Alabama 1943, p. 252, Code 1940, Tit. 26, § 376 et seq., is contrary to organic law, state and federal.
The act offends the rule of duplicity clearly stated in Section 45 of the Constitution of Alabama. Many authorities cited in Code 1940, Const. Art. IV, § 45, p. 98, Vol. 1 uphold this position. See Ballentyne v. Wickersham, 75 Ala. 533; Woolf v. Taylor, 98 Ala. 254, 13 So. 688; White v. Burgin, 113 Ala. 170, 21 So. 832; State v. Southern Ry. Co., 115 Ala. 250, 22 So. 589; Board of Revenue and Road Com’rs of Mobile County v.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ballentyne v. WickershamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Houston County Board of Revenue v. PoynerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Bassett v. NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- State Ex Rel. Bland v. St. JohnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- State v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.