State v. Restrepo
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
KLIEBERT, Judge.
This case comes to us on appeal after remand for resentencing. This court affirmed defendant’s conviction of attempted possession of over two hundred but less than four hundred grams of cocaine, but vacated his fifteen year sentence and $75,-000.00 fine because the record reflected the trial judge overlooked applicable mitigating factors and at the time of sentencing was initially mistaken as to the crime for which defendant was convicted and the applicable sentencing range. State v. Restrepo, 527 So.2d 473 (5th Cir.1988). Defendant, resen-tenced to twelve years at hard labor…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. LanclosSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- State v. DavenportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Restrepo v. FortunatoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- State v. PaigeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- State v. RestrepoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990