Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Dickson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 14, 1924No. Nos. 3867, 3868PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

Under the provisions of the Civil Code (1910),a§ 5517, the vendor of an automobile, who has retained title therein, has a right as owner of the legal title, in the event of the injury or destruction of such automobile, to maintain an action for the tort, and is entitled to recover such damages as he may have sustained by reason of the injury or destruction of the personalty to which he has retained or holds title, provided the damages recovered do not exceed the purchase-price; and it is not necessary to join the purchaser in the suit.

All the Justices concur. Miles W. Lewis and li.…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Staten v. General Exchange InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Allen v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. Rodgers v. StylesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  4. Ellis Motor Co. v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  5. Comer v. Rome Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API