Legal Opinion

United States v. Askari (Part II)

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 8, 1998No. 95-1662UnknownCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.

This case involves an interpretation of the sentencing guidelines. The issue on appeal before the en banc court is the continuing vitality of our opinion in United States v. Rosen, 896 F.2d 789 (3d Cir.1990), addressing § 5K2.13 of the United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual (Nov.1997) which permits a downward departure based on diminished capacity where the crime is nonviolent. The specific issue requires us to examine the meaning of “non-violent” offense under the sentencing guidelines.

Although resolution of this case would not…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. Richard O. BertoliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Maldonado-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. Jerome WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. Dominique JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Tony R. Jake, A/K/A SmileyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. BurnsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API