Legal Opinion

People v. Salgado

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 17, 2009No. 1-08-2832PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Mara Frossard

We are asked to decide whether incriminating statements made by defendant following an illegal arrest are sufficiently attenuated from the illegality of the arrest to render the statements admissible. Following a bench trial, Paul Salgado was convicted of the first degree murder of Julio Rodarte. He was sentenced to 30 years’ imprisonment for first degree murder with a 25-year enhancement for causing death with the use of a firearm. Defendant appealed. People v. Salgado, No. 1 — 03— 1753 (2006) (unpublished order under Supreme Court Rule 23) (Salgado I). We vacated the convictions and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. People v. PitmanIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. FoskeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. HernandezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  2. People v. LozanoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  3. People v. SalgadoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
  4. Salgado v. MelvinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API