Austin v. Clark Equipment Co.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TURK, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the defendants’ motions for summary judgment. Upon careful consideration of the record, applicable law, and the arguments presented by counsel at hearing, the court finds that defendants’ motions must be granted with respect to all of plaintiffs claims. 1
I. FACTS
This products liability action arises out of an accident which occurred on September 21, 1988, at Lee’s Carpet Division of Burlington Industries, Inc. (“Burlington”) located in Glasgow Virginia. The plaintiff, Brenda Austin, suffered personal injury when the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Logan v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1975
- Joseph W. Spangler v. Kranco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- Nancy L. Bly, Administratrix of Wayne A. Bly, Deceased v. Otis Elevator Company, a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Austin v. Clark Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Buettner v. Super Laundry MacHineryDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
- Freeman v. Case Corp.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1996
- Norris v. Excel Industries, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2015
- Edward Raymond Davis v. Simon-Telelect, Incorporated Eusco, Incorporated, and Telelect, Incorporated Simon United States Holdings, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.