Legal Opinion

In re Valentine

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 28, 1956No. 10022PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

Counsel for the trustee seeks review of an order of the referee allowing him $7,000, rather than the $10,000 requested, for professional services rendered the trustee, himself an able attorney experienced in bankruptcy matters.

The petition which counsel filed with the- referee contains 53 numbered paragraphs under the heading “ ‘Highlights’ of Services Rendered” and a 21-page time schedule showing 21,482 minutes, or 358 hours and 2 minutes, spent on the case. The inclusion among the “highlights” of such items as hiring a watchman, securing court approval of a $53.81 bill…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re American Range & Foundry Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1926
  2. In re FinemanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1940
  3. In re the Belfort Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1955
  4. In re MelhadoDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matter of Paramount Merrick, Inc., Bankrupt. Benjamin Finkel and Samuel L. Nadler, Copartners as Finkel & Nadler, David Strauss & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  2. In Re Dole CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1965
  3. In The Matter Of Midwest Engineering And Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  4. In re Dunnhell Suspender & Belt Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  5. Matter of Aaron Ferer & Sons Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API