In re Estate of Cherwinski
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentJoyce, J.
¶ 1 Upon my review, I cannot agree with the distinguished Majority’s conclusion that an order imposing a surcharge constitutes a final and appealable order when entered prior to the confirmation of the final accounting and schedule of distribution. Accordingly, I dissent.
¶ 2 In this Commonwealth, an appeal may only be taken from: “1) a final order or one certified by the trial court as final; 2) an interlocutory order as of right, 3) an interlocutory order by permission; or 4) a collateral order.” Morgan Trailer Mfg., Co. v. Hydraroll, Ltd., 804 A.2d 26, 29 (Pa.Super.2002). An order is not…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Tagnani v. LewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- In Re Estate of HarrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- In Re Estate of GenivivaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Donsavage EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.