Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 11, 1992No. 91-1756PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

604 So.2d 1277 (1992)

STATE of Florida, Appellant,

v.

Nathaniel Hirum THOMAS, Appellee.

No. 91-1756.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

September 11, 1992.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Nancy Ryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellant.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and M.A. Lucas, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellee.

HARRIS, Judge.

Nathaniel H. Thomas was a convicted felon suspected of selling small quantities of cocaine from his home. After conducting a controlled buy, the officers obtained a search warrant on February 4, 1991. Four…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Benefield v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
  2. Accarino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  3. Earman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  4. Berryman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  5. State v. RomanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. StevensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. BamberSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  3. State v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. State v. StevensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API