Legal Opinion

J.H. v. Hinds County, Mississippi

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided August 1, 2022No. 3:11-cv-00327Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION J.H., ET AL. PLAINTIFFS V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-327-DPJ-FKB HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, DEFENDANTS ET AL. ORDER Defendant Hinds County, Mississippi, has asked the Court to terminate or, alternatively, modify the Extended Third Amended Consent Decree. Plaintiffs’ initial response raised a threshold issue: whether the motion to terminate is premature under 18 U.S.C. § 3626(b)(1). The Court held an in-chambers status conference on May 17, 2022, after which it ordered additional briefing on that threshold question.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. MezzanattoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. United States v. David SpaldingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  3. Braggs v. DunnDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API