Legal Opinion

White v. Standard Life & Accident Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 18, 1907No. Nos. 14,969—(130)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, HaHam, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a trial and a directed verdict in favor of the defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

HER CURIAM.

'• Upon a former appeal the law of this case was laid down, viz., that the •company was -expressly exempt by the- contract of insurance from liability for death resulting wholly or in part, directly or indirectly, from bodily ■disease; and further, that it was conclusively established by the evidence that at the time the policy was issued,' and at the' time of the death of the assured he was affected with diabetes, and that such . disease directly cooperated with the injury in causing his death. 95 Minn. 77, 103 N. W. 735, 884.

The cause having been remanded for a new trial, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. White v. Standard Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bannister v. George H. Hurd Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Ashelby v. Travelers Insurance Co. of HartfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API