Legal Opinion

De Carlo v. Margolis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 6, 1935No. Appeal, 338PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

This action was in trespass for injuries to a boy 12 years of age. The suit was against the owner of the premises on which the accident occurred. From judgment entered on the verdict in favor of defendant plaintiffs have appealed.

The premises, 801 Washington Avenue in the City of Philadelphia, consisted of three stories. On the south side of this building, over the north sidewalk of Washington Avenue, was a fire escape, which consisted of two levels, with an opening from the lower or second floor to a drop ladder. The ladder, when not in use, was more than ten feet…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rugart v. Keebler-Weyl Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Rhad v. Duquesne Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Marsh v. GilesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  4. Rahe v. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Bannon v. The Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Powell v. LigonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Rapczynski Et Ux. v. W.T. Cowan, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Maksimshuk Et Ux. v. Union Coll. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Papa v. Pittsburgh Penn-Center Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API