Legal Opinion

Socha v. Webber

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided March 1, 1951No. A-6420PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOND, District Judge.

Defendant has moved that the complaint be stricken and the action dismissed'“for the reason that the plaintiff has wilfully failed to appear before Oren J. Casey at the time and place scheduled for the taking of his deposition”. Rule 37(d) Civil Rules of Federal Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., provides that such action .may be taken.

Plaintiff claims that the plaintiff was not required to appear for the taking of deposition since notice of it was not properly given. The alleged defects are .discussed below:(1) Plaintiff claims that the notice was defective since it was not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Collins v. WaylandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crummer v. BeelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Reserve Life Insurance v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  3. Knox v. LongTexas Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API