Legal Opinion
Tatum v. Oberg
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 25, 2011No. Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-1251 (JCH)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RULING RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. No. 158)
JANET C. HALL, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff, Gary L. Tatum (“Tatum”), brings this lawsuit against defendants Mary Christina Oberg (“Oberg”) and the law firm, Ford, Oberg, Manion and Houck, P.C. (“FOMH”), alleging breach of contract and legal malpractice. Oberg, an attorney at FOMH, previously represented Tatum in an action to dissolve Tatum’s marriage to Kathleen J. Murphy (“Murphy”). The defendants now move the court for summary judgment in their favor on Tatum’s claims for malpractice and breach of contract. For the reasons…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wright v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Kaytor v. Electric Boat Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Beyer v. County of NassauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Loeffler v. Staten Island University HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kalra v. Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2022