Legal Opinion

Bryan College Interurban Ry. Co. v. Kropp

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 22, 1917No. 5876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPly, C. J.

This is a suit instituted by ap-pellee to recover on two promissory notes, each due on March 1, 1916, and to foreclose a laborer’s lien on the property of appellant, which it was alleged that appellee held under the Constitution and laws of Texas. The appointment of a receiver was also sought. The notes were executed in the name of appellant by O. E. Gammill, who was alleged to have been, at the time, the vice president and general manager of the railway company. His authority to execute the notes was denied by appellant. Appellant filed a general demurrer and a number of special exceptions,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Culbertson v. CabeenTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  2. City Electric Street Railway Co. v. First National Exchange BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  3. Cushwa v. Improvement L. & B. Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Dalton v. RaineyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  5. Texas P. R'y Co. v. NicholsonTexas Supreme Court · 1884

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. of New York v. Alamo Iron WorksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. Finks v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Warren Central R. v. Texas Creosoting Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API