Legal Opinion

Tuttman v. Shermet

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1962Published

1Opinion of the CourtHabold J. Cbaweoed, J.

This is a motion by the judgment debtor to vacate a third-party subpoena served upon the judgment debtor’s bank, the Underwriter’s Trust Company.

The judgment debtor claims that the third-party subpoena affects two accounts in his bank, one, a regular account with a balance of $89.09, and, the other, a special account with a balance of $691.89 of which $633.89 are held by him for clients in his capacity as attorney, and thus are trust funds, and $58.09 belong to him. The judgment debtor claims that the third-party subpoena should not affect the funds in the special account which are being held…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grimm Building Material Co. v. WilcoxAlbany City Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API