Legal Opinion
Marmolejo v. Gonzales
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 10, 2006No. 03-74372PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Alberto Marmolejo appeals the BIA’s decision that he is removable. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we grant the petition. The facts are known to the parties and are not recited here.
The parties ask that the original appeal from the IJ’s decision and the supplemental evidence of the vacated conviction be considered together as a single appeal on the question of removability. The issue before us, then, is whether the Government has shown, by clear and convincing evidence, that Marmolejo is removable based on his conviction for “failure to provide” pursuant to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
- PICKERINGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2003
- Marco Antonio Lara-Cazares v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Oumar Sissoko Julie Sissoko v. Loyda R. Rocha United States of America, Oumar Sissoko, an Individual Julie Sissoko, an Individual v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service Doris Meissner, Commissioner, United States Ins Richard Nmi Rogers, District Director, United States Ins Four Unknown Named Officers, of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service United States U.S. Public Health Services Joseph Chen, Md Unknown Named Employees of the United States Public Health Services, and Loyda R. Rocha, Immigration Inspector, United States InsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. Rodriguez CA6California Court of Appeal · 2014