Conner v. Wall
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Hamilton Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtWorden, C. J.
This was an action by the appellee *253against William W. Conner and John C. Conner, upon a promissory note. Finding by the court, and judgment for the plaintiff.
D. Moss, for appellant. J. O'Brien and W. O’Brien, for appellee.
John C. Conner alone appeals, arid assigns for error the following only: ‘fNow comes the appellant and says there is manifest error in the record and proceedings, in this, that the finding of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence.”
No authorities need be cited to the point that no question is raised by this assignment of error. The error should have' been assigned…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Wiley ex rel. Scobey v. BarclayIndiana Supreme Court · 1877