Legal Opinion

In re Schmidt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order denying motion for a peremptory mandamus order unanimously affirmed, without costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. Section 44-c of the State Finance Law is not in conflict with section 136 of the Civil Practice Act. It merely provides what the depository may do with court funds when the court directing the deposit fails to exercise its permissive power to direct that the funds be held in specie or invested in a particular form. The State Finance Law section merely supplements section 136 of the Civil Practice Act in a field where the court has refrained from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People Ex Rel. Ryan v. . GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Giancursio v. GiancursioNew York City Family Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API