Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tice v. Nationwide Life Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 6, 1981No. 2938Published

1DissentCavanaugh, Judge

Because in my view the majority and concurring opinions do serious harm to our strong policy of waiver, I dissent.

The concept of waiver—that issues must be raised in the lower court to be considered on appeal—is basic to Pennsylvania appellate review. Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 302 declares: “[ijssues not raised in the lower court are waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.” Pa.R.A.P. 302. Moreover, in 1974 our Supreme Court held that even fundamental error may be waived in both criminal and civil cases. Commonwealth v. Clair, 458 Pa. 418, 326 A.2d 272 (1974);…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. GravelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API