State v. McGill
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hill, J.:
Dajuan McGill appeals the revocation of his felony probation. He contends the district judge could only impose an intermediate sanction in his case because the judge failed to first find that the safety of the public or McGill’s own welfare would be jeopardized if he was not sent to prison, that he had committed a new felony or misdemeanor, or that he had absconded from supervision. McGill argues K.S.A. 2013 Supp. 22-3716 controls the issue. Because the statutory amendments mentioned by McGill apply only to violations occurring on and after July 1,2013, we hold the amendments to that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. GumforySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- Miami County Board of Commissioners v. Kanza Rail-Trails Conservancy, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- State v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- State v. BillingsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. DooleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
- State v. LyonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- State v. BubeckCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- State v. HolleyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- State v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.