Legal Opinion · Dissent

Norton v. Board of Education

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 20, 1987No. 85CA1046Published

1DissentMetzger, Judge

I respectfully dissent as to part I of the majority’s opinion which concludes that the Board’s consideration of public comment was mere “harmless error.” I would remand this matter to the Board to reconsider the hearing officer’s report without receiving public comment and without considering such comment as it has already received.

In Cordova v. Lara, 42 Colo.App. 483, 600 P.2d 105 (1979) and in Merritt v. Consolidated School District No. 8, 522 P.2d 137 (Colo.App.1974) (not selected for official publication), this court held that the Board’s consideration of extraneous information was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cordova v. LaraColorado Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Merritt v. CONSOLIDATED SCH. D. NO. 8, RIO GRANDE CTY.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API