Buffalo Specialty Co. v. Gougar
Colorado Court of Appeals
Error to Denver District Court. Hon. Harry C. Riddle, Judge.
1Concurrence
King, J.,
specially concurring:
I concur in affirming the judgment of the District Court, but place my concurrence on the ground that the -contract sued on is- void because against public policy and in undue restraint of trade.
There is no doubt that the suit is predicated on the- contract, and that only, and demands damages for alleged; violation of its conditions, whether that violation consists of acts amounting to- an infringement of a patent or in the manufacure, use and- sale of, or being interested in, articles- (possibly not-patented or patentable), the manufacture, use and sale of which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Bishop v. PalmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Seay v. SpratlingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Webb Press Co. v. BierceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906