Legal Opinion

Hall v. McArthur

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 8, 1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Promissory notes. Pleadings. Consideration. Amendment. Before Judge Kibbee. Pulaski superior court. May term, 1888. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, Justice.

McArthur, surviving partner of McArthur & Griffin, sued Hall upon a promissory note for $150, which note was payable to said firm. The defendant pleaded the general issue, and afterwards offered an amendment to his plea, in substance as follows: that the note sued on was given in part payment for a certain lot of land; that at the time of the purchase of the land, it was expressly stipulated between him and Griffin that Griffin would deliver to him a full chain of titles, Griffin representing to the defendant that he had a full chain of titles to the land, from the State down…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fisher v. Dow Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. DoaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API