Legal Opinion · Dissent

Banellis v. Yackel

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 1980Published

1DissentMeyer, J.

I respectfully dissent. The holding of the majority effectively renders subdivision (a) of section 1210 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law meaningless against any vehicle owner who is prepared to testify that though he left the keys in his car they were "hidden from sight”. Seldom if ever will a plaintiff who has been injured by a thief who stole the car in which defendant left the keys be able to present evidence contradicting defendant’s claim that the keys were "hidden from sight”. In my view, therefore, the holding should be that, unless contradictory proof is available, the testimony of a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Elwood v. . the Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Ferris v. . SterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Foreman v. ForemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Hull v. . LittauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Kavanagh v. . WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1877

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API