Legal Opinion

LaChance v. Hoyt

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 24, 1969No. File No. CV 14-685-35851Published

1Per curiam

The issues presented on this appeal from a judgment of possession in a summary process action are (1) whether proof of a landlord’s retaliatory motive or intent constitutes a defense to a summary process action,2 and (2) whether a tenant may interpose constitutional issues in an attempt to defeat the action of summary process.

The record in this case discloses that no finding was made and none was requested. Practice Book § 979.3 The trial court’s rather lengthy memorandum of decision contains much dictum as to which we decline to express an opinion one way or the other. It is sufficient for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. International Union United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Yvonne C. Edwards v. Nathan HabibCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  3. Norwalk Teachers' Ass'n v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  4. Gabriel v. BorowyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  5. Craig v. DunleavySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API