Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Stillwater Water Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 18, 1895No. Nos. 9462-(69)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Washington county; Williston, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

COLLINS, J.2

Defendant is the owner of a block of land in the city of Stillwater, abutting Fourth street on the east; while plaintiff is the owner of a smaller tract, a few rods distant, in a southerly direction. Through defendant’s land, when in its natural condition, there was a deep ravine, in which ran a small stream of water, and, at certain seasons of the year, large quantities of surface waters gathered therein, making their way easterly to Lake St. Croix, less than a mile away. South of the ravine, and about on the south line of defendant’s land, was a natural barrier, — a ridge of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moore v. TownsendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  2. Kray v. MuggliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  3. Cohen v. SteinkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. Voligny v. Stillwater Water Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API