Legal Opinion
Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided May 12, 2006No. CV 05-261-TUC-CKJPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JORGENSON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Partial Motion for Protective Order and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings which were contemporaneously filed with the Court. The Motion for Protective Order is fully briefed as a response and reply brief were subsequently filed with the Court. However, as Plaintiffs argue that they are entitled to discovery in relation to the Partial Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, they have not filed a response. Rather, the parties have stipulated that only after the Court rules on the Motion for Protective Order, shall…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Stauffer Chemical Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance Company, Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Monsanto Company Reichhold Limited Fmc Corporation Bridgestone/firestone, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Phillips v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Western Watersheds Project v. USDA APHISDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2020