Legal Opinion

Ocilla Southern Railroad v. Beavers

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 11, 1918No. 9177Published

Action for damages; from Ben Hill superior court—Judge Crum. July 25, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

The petition as amended, was sufficient to withstand the demurrer, and the court ’did not err in overruling the demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and'Harwell, J., eoneur.

*202The defendant demurred to 'the petition generally, and demurred specially to the allegations as to the danger that the plaintiff saw before leaping, and to the allegations of negligence.

Wall & Grantham, Quincey & Rice, for plaintiff in error, cited:

Walker v. A. & W. P. R. Co., 103 Ga. 820, 822-3; Blackstone v. Cen. Ry. Co., 112 Ga. 762; Price v. Cen. Ry. Co., 124 Ga. 899; E. T. &c. R. Co. v. Head, 92 Ga. 723; Stewart…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hendrix v. Vale Royal Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Stewart v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. AttawayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  5. Smith v. Wrightsville & Tennille RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API