Legal Opinion

National Advertising Co. v. Scovil Motors, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 30, 1978No. 50501Published

1Opinion of the Court

ROMANG, Judge:

The parties in this lawsuit are National Advertising Company (National), and Scovil Motors, Inc. (Scovil). National was in the business of billboard advertising. Scovil was in the business of selling new and used cars at Norman, Oklahoma.

This is a suit by National against Scovil to recover the balance due for billboard advertising. Trial before the court without a jury resulted in judgment for Scovil. The trial court’s minute reads:

Gadd found to be plaintiff’s agent, not defendant’s, for purpose of plaintiff’s contract.

National has appealed, and here presents two propositions…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Store of Happiness v. Carmona & Allen, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Central Natl. Bank & Trust Co. of Enid v. Community Bk. & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  3. Wallace v. SinclairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Oklahoma Publishing Co. v. Video Independent Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API