Hoesly v. State, Dept. of Social Services
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.
Acting through the defendant-appellee Nebraska Department of Social Services and its director, the defendant-appellee Kermit R. McMurry, the State disqualified the plaintiff-appellant, William Hoesly, from receiving further public assistance monies. Hoesly appealed to the district court, which implicitly found that Hoesly had renounced an after-acquired interest in certain personal property with the intention and for the purpose of continuing to qualify for such assistance, and thus affirmed the State’s determination. Hoesly here asserts the district court erred in so ruling. We affirm.
Because…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. GarzaNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Professional Firefighters of Omaha, Local 385 v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Interest of PowersNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Hamilton v. HamiltonNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Curry v. State Ex Rel. StenbergNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jantzen v. Diller Telephone Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Lincoln v. Norris Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Essen v. GilmoreNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Pratt v. Nebraska Board of ParoleNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Lexington v. Dawson County Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1993