Legal Opinion

Amayo v. Amayo

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 30, 2017No. S17F0991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MELTON, Presiding Justice.

Following a jury trial regarding the divorce of Tangi Renita Amayo (Wife) and Galahad Owen Amayo (Husband), the trial court awarded attorney fees to Husband under OCGA § 9-15-14.1 Thereafter, Wife filed an application for a discretionary appeal, which we granted. In doing so, we directed the parties to address the following question: Did the trial court err in its September 30, 2016 order on the parties’ cross-motions for attorney fees by ordering Wife to pay $ 1,080 in attorney fees under OCGA § 9-15-14 without making express findings specifying the abusive conduct…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McKemie v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  2. Williams v. BeckerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  3. Georgia Department of Transportation v. Douglas Asphalt Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. ADAMS v. PINETREE TRAIL ENTERPRISES, LLC Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  2. Amayo v. AmayoSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  3. MICHAEL PORTMAN v. TINA PORTILLO ZIPPERERCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API