Legal Opinion

Hays v. Louisiana Wild Life & Fisheries Commission

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 1963No. 839PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TATE, Judge.

This is a mandamus proceeding. The defendant Commission appeals from judgment ordering it to reinstate the plaintiff as wildlife ranger at a certain rate of pay, and further ordering it to pay him back salary from the date of his illegal discharge through the date of his reinstatement per court order. By answer to this appeal, the plaintiff-employee prays that the trial court judgment be amended so as to order the payment of his back and current salary to him at a greater monthly rate than that awarded by the trial court.

This suit is a sequel to litigation in which the Supreme…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hays v. Louisiana Wild Life and Fisheries CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  2. State Ex Rel. Boucher v. HeardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  3. Bennett v. Louisiana Wild Life & Fisheries CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  4. State Ex Rel. Anderson v. WalkerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  5. State ex rel. Aderson v. WalkerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hays v. Louisiana Wild Life and Fisheries Com'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Sewell v. New Orleans Police DepartmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Promise v. McGlothinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Quina v. Orleans Parish School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Rudloff v. Chief Administrative OfficeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API