Legal Opinion

In re Garment Center Capitol, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 6, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CAFFEY, District Judge.

No facts are furnished to sustain an application to intervene.

The petitioner, without intervention, is entitled to notice of hearing on any proposed plan of reorganization. The statute so provides. So far as concerns the facts disclosed,' the petitioner needs nothing but an opportunity to be heard on such a plan.

It is merely obstructive and merely increases the expense of administering the estate, and hence is adverse to the interests of all creditors (including the petitioner), to multiply the number of interveners.

The court will gladly hear any person interested.…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Associated Gas & Electric Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API