Legal Opinion

McCloskey v. Downingtown Woolen Mills, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 7, 1927No. 3023PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, District Judge.

A creditors’ bill was filed, averring that the«Downing-town Woolen Mills, Inc., owned assets largely in excess of its liabilities, that it was presently unable to pay its creditors, that it was threatened with numerous suits, that its embarrassed condition was due to lack of sufficient working capital, and that, unless a receiver was appointed, its assets would be sacrificed and its business, which might be profitably carried on to the advantage of all creditors, would be destroyed. The answer of the corporation admitted the averments of the bill. Thereupon, on April…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re GrisslerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
  2. Commonwealth Roofing Co. v. North American Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1905
  3. Wagner v. BurnhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Hempfield Homes, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API