McCloskey v. Downingtown Woolen Mills, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, District Judge.
A creditors’ bill was filed, averring that the«Downing-town Woolen Mills, Inc., owned assets largely in excess of its liabilities, that it was presently unable to pay its creditors, that it was threatened with numerous suits, that its embarrassed condition was due to lack of sufficient working capital, and that, unless a receiver was appointed, its assets would be sacrificed and its business, which might be profitably carried on to the advantage of all creditors, would be destroyed. The answer of the corporation admitted the averments of the bill. Thereupon, on April…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re GrisslerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
- Commonwealth Roofing Co. v. North American Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1905
- Wagner v. BurnhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Hempfield Homes, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959