State v. Stoepel
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On eertiorari. Argued at February Term, 1892, before Justices Dixon, Reed and Garrison.
1Opinion of the Court
*487The opinion of the court was delivered by
Garrison, J.
The defendant Dorothea Stoepel made her application at the October Term of the Camden Pleas for a license to keep an inn and tavern. A remonstrance was filed by the prosecutors of this writ, and upon October 27th the court refused to grant a license. On the same day a motion was made on behalf of the defendant to open the application, and on October 31st an order was made opening the application for reconsideration. This writ was then sued out by the prosecutors bringing up the record and challenging the power of the Court of Common Pleas…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. PancoastSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
3Cited by4 opinions
- Breese v. WintersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- Coyle v. Succession of CreevySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1882
- Cramer v. SooySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
- Johnson v. WentzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911