Legal Opinion

Hall v. Edwards

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 12, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThaxter, J.

This is an action for slander. After a verdict for the plaintiff, the case is before us on a general motion for a new trial based on the usual grounds, that the verdict is against the law and the evidence, and that the damages are excessive.

A careful reading of the evidence shows no serious dispute as to the salient facts. The jury would have been warranted in finding that the defendant on several occasions and in the presence of third persons charged the plaintiff with having stolen the defendant’s boards and referred to him as a thief. With a plea of the general issue, the defendant filed a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. StarrettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1903
  2. Elms v. CraneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
  3. Stanley v. PrinceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
  4. Sullivan v. McCaffertySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. RaymondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  2. Saunders v. VanPeltSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  3. McMullen v. CorkumSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1947
  4. New England Surfaces v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  5. Kinderhaus North LLC v. Karl NicolsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API