Looker v. State Ex Rel. Dillian
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
Were it not for the facts presented in the second defense, we should feel inclined to affirm the order of the Court of Appeals commanding the county commissioners to restore the appropriation,' and, when restored, to compel the county auditor to issue his warrant to the relator for the amount due him by reason of the reduction of the appropriation.
The appellate court found there were sufficient funds in the county treasury, unappropriated for any other purpose, to pay relator’s claim. We are in accord with the Court of Appeals in its holding that mandamus was the proper remedy; that under our…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Duncan Townsite Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- New York Mortgage Co. v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Robertson Inv. Co. v. PattersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1934
- Currie v. Baltimore Ohio Rd. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1936