Legal Opinion

United States v. Thomas

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1955No. Crim. No. 18247PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAFT, District Judge.

The defendant, Will Thomas, was indicted for receiving jewelry1 of the value of $5,000 or more, moving in interstate commerce, knowing the jewelry to have been stolen. Defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the government’s evidence was overruled. Defendant then rested his case without offering evidence and again moved for judgment of acquittal. The trial judge reserved decision on this mo*663tion and submitted the case to the jury which returned a verdict of guilty.

The evidence was clearly sufficient to establish that Thomas received stolen jewelry…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. John Digilio, in No. 75-2218. Appeal of Harry Lupo, in No. 75-2219. Appeal of Peter Szwandrak, in No. 75-2220Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. BarkerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1970
  3. United States v. John Digilio, in No. 75-2218. Appeal of Harry Lupo, in No. 75-2219. Appeal of Peter Szwandrak, in No. 75-2220Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API