Legal Opinion

Hayden v. Gokenbach

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 5, 1991No. Docket No. 104905Published

1Opinion of the Court

*490AFTER REMAND

Before: Cynar, P.J., and Shepherd and Marilyn Kelly, JJ. Marilyn Kelly, J.

This case involves the propriety of the Macomb Circuit Court’s decision to quash substituted service of the summons and complaint on the defendant’s insurer, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company.

In our previous opinion we held that, if Hartford is liable for plaintiff’s damages in the event defendant Gokenbach is found negligent, then the substituted service on Hartford was good. We remanded the case for a determination of whether Gokenbach was covered under the insurance policy, and we retained…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hayden v. GokenbachMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API